Since COVID19 broke out, the BC Courts have heard quite a few pressing functions regarding parenting disputes. They’ve supplied tips on tips on how to co-parent through the pandemic. Custody points are usually resolved by way of the Provincial Court docket and the Supreme Court docket of BC. Listed below are the most recent circumstances and commentary from our judges on parenting disputes and tips on how to resolve them throughout Coronavirus instances:

Case: The Mom Nurse Who Handled A COVID19 Affected person

CASE:  S.R. v. M.G., 2020 BCPC 57:


  • The mom is a nurse who handled a affected person with COVID19; she went into self-isolation for 14 days after treating the affected person.
  • The daddy runs a demolition firm which continues to function. He does go to his workplace on occasion.
  • The daddy started denying parenting time to the mom on condition that she had are available in contact with a COVID19 affected person.
  • The daddy was proposing video contact or in-person contact the place the kid would see the mom from her balcony.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The Court docket acknowledged:

Now that the virus is spreading locally, we’re exposing accessing any companies, in anyway.  This consists of receiving the newspaper or mail, buying groceries, attending at a financial institution, or going for a stroll.

The decide supplied a variety of components to contemplate in determing parenting points throughout COVID19:

  1. Whether or not the kid is at a greater danger of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  2. Whether or not both social gathering, or these of their family are at greater danger of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  3. Every social gathering’s publicity to the danger of contracting the virus;
  4.  Steps taken by every social gathering to mitigate the danger of publicity;
  5. Within the bigger context, society’s want to keep up and entry assets locally, together with well being care and different ventures that present companies and revenue for households in a protected method over an prolonged time period.

The decide acknowledged that “a few of these staff are selecting to not return residence to their households once they stay with notably weak companions, kids and fogeys.”


The dad and mom had been ordered to make sure that the kid sees each dad and mom.

This case is attention-grabbing as a result of whereas the mom could be seen as being in a “riskier-than-normal” occupation, merely grocery procuring entails a degree of danger as nicely.

The danger that the mom experiences, which she has taken steps to mitigate, will not be a lot extra elevated than the danger the daddy additionally experiences. The danger to the mom is to not the purpose that the kid needs to be disadvantaged of parenting time together with her, given the advantages to the kid of time with each dad and mom.

The Touring Kids Case 

CASE: V.C.S. v. T.S., 2020 BCPC 60


  • The mom lives in Decrease Mainland. The daddy lives in Prince George.
  • Father has main residence of the youngsters and mom has parenting time with them through the holidays.
  • The daddy introduced the youngsters through automotive to the Decrease Mainland to go to the mom. When he tried to have the youngsters again to PG, the mom refused.
  • The mom reasoned that given the pandemic, it might be unsafe to move the youngsters as a result of they must get off the automotive, eat and use public washrooms which might improve the probabilities of contracting COVID19.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The decide acknowledged that:

  1. Which might be no insurance policies or guidelines that stop folks from having take out or drive by way of meals;
  2. There are not any insurance policies or guidelines that might stop folks from utilizing public washrooms;
  3. Neither the youngsters nor the dad and mom had COVID19.
  4. The mom had no points with the daddy bringing the youngsters down to go to her through the COVID19 however now was saying that it might be unsafe to return them to the daddy.

End result 

The kids had been ordered to journey again to the Prince George to be with the daddy.

The Court docket acknowledged:

[21]        It’s evident that our well being authorities deem it protected for Canadians to proceed to enter grocery shops and fuel stations which home public washrooms, supplied they follow preventative measures equivalent to social distancing and washing their palms.  I’ve been supplied no proof as to why it’s notably unsafe for the youngsters to make use of public washrooms in these services when it isn’t unsafe for different Canadians to take action.

The Mom with Psychological and Drug Points

CASE: N.J.B. v. S.F., 2020 BCPC 53


  • Earlier than COVID19, the mom’s parenting time with the kid was supervised by her relations;
  • The mom had a historical past of drug use, psychological well being issues and paranoia;
  • The daddy started limiting mom’s entry to the kid noting that the mom has by no means been mentally secure, and won’t possible take correct measures to ensure the kid will not be uncovered to the virus;
  • The daddy reasoned that the mom is unable to have a rational, logical thoughts and was placing little one in danger throughout very dangerous instances.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The decide reasoned as follows:

  • The daddy should level out to particular, provable issues regarding COVID19 and the mom’s lack of ability to handle the kid;
  • The mom’s historical past was nothing new, and her parenting time was supervised so these issues had been already addressed previous to COVID19;
  • Parenting preparations needs to be revered as a lot as potential throughout COVID19 except there are severe and actual issues to justify altering or limiting entry to kids.
  • The decide additionally quoted and endorsed some very helpful tips from consultants and a few Ontario circumstances regarding COVID19 which everybody ought to learn:

[28]        Dr. Elterman describes quite a lot of frequent parenting choices which will improve dangers for each the kid and the neighborhood, and will type a part of choices relating to parenting preparations. They embody:

  1.  If a dad or mum has had contact with an contaminated social gathering, they need to disclose this instantly to the opposite dad or mum.
  2.  If the dad or mum is contaminated and even in poor health with signs or wanted to be examined for Covid-19, they need to not take the kid.
  3.  If the dad or mum is in a house with older relations or buddies or with people who’re immune-compromised, the kid shouldn’t be in that residence.
  4. There needs to be no play dates and the kid shouldn’t be taken to household or social gatherings.
  5. If parenting time is to happen in a public place equivalent to a neighborhood centre, a mall or a restaurant, then it needs to be suspended.
  6. If a supervisor is required and who will not be the partner of the dad or mum and residing within the residence, then the parenting time needs to be suspended.
  7.  If both dad or mum or anybody within the family is in an Important Service or nonetheless working with the general public, eg. medical doctors, nurses, at a grocery store or pharmacy, flight attendant, and so forth.) then this could signify an elevated danger to the kid.

[29]        In my opinion, these are all cheap suggestions, and in keeping with what I perceive to be the suggestions of public well being officers, presently. Though public well being tips will not be technically earlier than the Court docket, in my opinion, and notably underneath the exigent and evolving circumstances that all of us at the moment face, I’m able to take judicial discover of these tips, which embody social distancing, frequent washing of palms and avoiding non-essential journey.

[30]        There are a number of written choices which have emerged in Ontario which have begun to handle the household points arising within the context of Covid-19. In Le v. Norris 2020 ONSC 1932, the Court docket thought-about a case by which the mom was withholding parenting time for the daddy opposite to a Court docket Order because of her issues about Covid-19 transmission. The Court docket ordered compliance with the parenting Order and in doing so stated the next:

[11]  As well as, one thing direct have to be stated about Le’s worries and anxiousness in regards to the COVID-19 well being disaster. These issues, this Court docket sympathizes with and understands and might even relate to (however my relative privileged existence, far faraway from the toils of these engaged on the entrance strains to produce and deal with me and my neighbours). However, on the identical time, these issues may be addressed by way of accountable adherence to the prevailing Court docket Order.

[12]  This Court docket orders that the December 5, 2019 Order of Kurz J., with regard to entry between Norris and the kid C., shall be complied with in all respects. This Court docket orders, additional, that the police are hereby approved to implement the stated Order, and the one made herein.

[13]  Lastly, what do I imply by “accountable adherence to the prevailing Court docket Order”? I imply being sensible and having some primary frequent sense. Bodily distancing measures have to be revered. The events should do no matter they’ll to make sure that neither of them nor the kid, C., contracts COVID-19. Each precautionary measure really useful by governments and well being authorities in Ontario and Canada have to be taken by each events and, with their assist, by C. Neither social gathering shall do something that may expose him/herself or C. to an elevated danger of contracting the virus.

[31]        In Ribeiro v. Wright 2020 ONSC 1829, the Court docket stated the next:

[21]  We are going to cope with COVID-19 parenting points on a case-by-case foundation.

  1. The dad or mum initiating an pressing movement on this subject might be required to supply particular proof or examples of conduct or plans by the opposite dad or mum that are inconsistent with COVID-19 protocols.
  2. The dad or mum responding to such an pressing movement might be required to supply particular and absolute reassurance that COVID-19 security measures might be meticulously adhered to – together with social distancing; use of disinfectants; compliance with public security directives; and so forth.
  3. Each dad and mom might be required to supply very particular and reasonable time-sharing proposals which absolutely tackle all COVID-19 issues, in a child-focused method.
  4. Judges will possible take judicial discover of the truth that social distancing is now turning into each commonplace and accepted, given the variety of public services which have now been closed. This can be a superb time for each custodial and entry dad and mom to spend time with their little one at residence.

[23]  Judges received’t want convincing that COVID-19 is extraordinarily severe, and that significant precautions are required to guard kids and households. We all know there’s an issue. What we’re in search of is reasonable options. We might be trying to see if dad and mom have made good religion efforts to speak; to indicate mutual respect; and to provide you with artistic and reasonable proposals which exhibit each parental perception and COVID-19 consciousness.

End result

The decide ordered the mom’s parenting time to be resumed.

Abstract and Takeaway

The brief abstract of all the above is that point with each dad and mom are essential. And that, to some extent, practically everyone seems to be participating in actions which have some degree of danger.


  • parenting preparations require transportation or driving to a different neighborhood,
  • one of many dad and mom is in a riskier occupation,
  • one of many dad and mom has a monitor report of earlier irrational behaviour, and so forth

These issues are inadequate to withhold parenting time. It’s usually anticipated that parenting orders or preparations might be obeyed and that kids will proceed to see each dad and mom in these instances, absent very extraordinary and concrete points.  Courts are taking the view that point with dad and mom continues to be helpful and youngsters are entitled to it.

In case you have any issues regarding parenting and COVID19 period, name us at 604-974-9529 or get in touch. 





Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here