Since COVID19 broke out, the BC Courts have heard quite a few pressing functions referring to parenting disputes. They’ve supplied tips on the right way to co-parent throughout the pandemic. Custody points are typically resolved by way of the Provincial Court docket and the Supreme Court docket of BC. Listed below are the most recent instances and commentary from our judges on parenting disputes and the right way to resolve them throughout Coronavirus instances:

Case: The Mom Nurse Who Handled A COVID19 Affected person

CASE:  S.R. v. M.G., 2020 BCPC 57:


  • The mom is a nurse who handled a affected person with COVID19; she went into self-isolation for 14 days after treating the affected person.
  • The daddy runs a demolition firm which continues to function. He does go to his workplace on occasion.
  • The daddy started denying parenting time to the mom provided that she had are available in contact with a COVID19 affected person.
  • The daddy was proposing video contact or in-person contact the place the kid would see the mom from her balcony.

Reasoning by the Decide 

The Court docket said:

Now that the virus is spreading in the neighborhood, we’re exposing accessing any providers, in anyway.  This consists of receiving the newspaper or mail, buying groceries, attending at a financial institution, or going for a stroll.

The decide supplied quite a few elements to think about in determing parenting points throughout COVID19:

  1. Whether or not the kid is at a larger danger of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  2. Whether or not both occasion, or these of their family are at larger danger of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  3. Every occasion’s publicity to the chance of contracting the virus;
  4.  Steps taken by every occasion to mitigate the chance of publicity;
  5. Within the bigger context, society’s want to keep up and entry assets in the neighborhood, together with well being care and different ventures that present providers and earnings for households in a protected method over an prolonged time period.

The decide acknowledged that “a few of these employees are selecting to not return residence to their households after they stay with significantly susceptible companions, youngsters and oldsters.”


The dad and mom had been ordered to make sure that the kid sees each dad and mom.

This case is attention-grabbing as a result of whereas the mom is likely to be seen as being in a “riskier-than-normal” occupation, merely grocery purchasing entails a stage of danger as effectively.

The danger that the mom experiences, which she has taken steps to mitigate, is just not a lot extra elevated than the chance the daddy additionally experiences. The danger to the mom is to not the purpose that the kid ought to be disadvantaged of parenting time together with her, given the advantages to the kid of time with each dad and mom.

The Touring Youngsters Case 

CASE: V.C.S. v. T.S., 2020 BCPC 60


  • The mom lives in Decrease Mainland. The daddy lives in Prince George.
  • Father has main residence of the kids and mom has parenting time with them throughout the holidays.
  • The daddy introduced the kids by way of automobile to the Decrease Mainland to go to the mom. When he tried to have the kids again to PG, the mom refused.
  • The mom reasoned that given the pandemic, it will be unsafe to move the kids as a result of they must get off the automobile, eat and use public washrooms which might improve the probabilities of contracting COVID19.

Reasoning by the Decide 

The decide said that:

  1. Which might be no insurance policies or guidelines that stop folks from having take out or drive by way of meals;
  2. There are not any insurance policies or guidelines that might stop folks from utilizing public washrooms;
  3. Neither the kids nor the dad and mom had COVID19.
  4. The mom had no points with the daddy bringing the children down to go to her throughout the COVID19 however now was saying that it will be unsafe to return them to the daddy.

End result 

The kids had been ordered to journey again to the Prince George to be with the daddy.

The Court docket said:

[21]        It’s evident that our well being authorities deem it protected for Canadians to proceed to enter grocery shops and fuel stations which home public washrooms, supplied they observe preventative measures comparable to social distancing and washing their fingers.  I’ve been supplied no proof as to why it’s significantly unsafe for the kids to make use of public washrooms in these services when it isn’t unsafe for different Canadians to take action.

The Mom with Psychological and Drug Points

CASE: N.J.B. v. S.F., 2020 BCPC 53


  • Earlier than COVID19, the mom’s parenting time with the kid was supervised by her relations;
  • The mom had a historical past of drug use, psychological well being considerations and paranoia;
  • The daddy started limiting mom’s entry to the kid noting that the mom has by no means been mentally steady, and won’t doubtless take correct measures to verify the kid is just not uncovered to the virus;
  • The daddy reasoned that the mom is unable to have a rational, logical thoughts and was placing little one in danger throughout very dangerous instances.

Reasoning by the Decide 

The decide reasoned as follows:

  • The daddy should level out to particular, provable considerations referring to COVID19 and the mom’s lack of ability to handle the kid;
  • The mom’s historical past was nothing new, and her parenting time was supervised so these considerations had been already addressed previous to COVID19;
  • Parenting preparations ought to be revered as a lot as attainable throughout COVID19 until there are critical and actual considerations to justify altering or limiting entry to youngsters.
  • The decide additionally quoted and endorsed some very helpful tips from consultants and a few Ontario instances referring to COVID19 which everybody ought to learn:

[28]        Dr. Elterman describes a wide range of widespread parenting selections which will improve dangers for each the kid and the group, and may kind a part of selections relating to parenting preparations. They embody:

  1.  If a mum or dad has had contact with an contaminated occasion, they need to disclose this instantly to the opposite mum or dad.
  2.  If the mum or dad is contaminated and even in poor health with signs or wanted to be examined for Covid-19, they need to not take the kid.
  3.  If the mum or dad is in a house with older relations or mates or with people who’re immune-compromised, the kid shouldn’t be in that residence.
  4. There ought to be no play dates and the kid shouldn’t be taken to household or social gatherings.
  5. If parenting time is to happen in a public place comparable to a group centre, a mall or a restaurant, then it ought to be suspended.
  6. If a supervisor is required and who is just not the partner of the mum or dad and residing within the residence, then the parenting time ought to be suspended.
  7.  If both mum or dad or anybody within the family is in an Important Service or nonetheless working with the general public, eg. medical doctors, nurses, at a grocery store or pharmacy, flight attendant, and so on.) then this will signify an elevated danger to the kid.

[29]        In my opinion, these are all affordable suggestions, and per what I perceive to be the suggestions of public well being officers, at the moment. Though public well being tips usually are not technically earlier than the Court docket, for my part, and significantly underneath the exigent and evolving circumstances that all of us at present face, I’m able to take judicial discover of these tips, which embody social distancing, frequent washing of fingers and avoiding non-essential journey.

[30]        There are just a few written selections which have emerged in Ontario which have begun to deal with the household points arising within the context of Covid-19. In Le v. Norris 2020 ONSC 1932, the Court docket thought of a case by which the mom was withholding parenting time for the daddy opposite to a Court docket Order on account of her considerations about Covid-19 transmission. The Court docket ordered compliance with the parenting Order and in doing so mentioned the next:

[11]  As well as, one thing direct should be mentioned about Le’s worries and anxiousness in regards to the COVID-19 well being disaster. These considerations, this Court docket sympathizes with and understands and might even relate to (however my relative privileged existence, far faraway from the toils of these engaged on the entrance traces to produce and deal with me and my neighbours). However, on the identical time, these considerations will be addressed by way of accountable adherence to the present Court docket Order.

[12]  This Court docket orders that the December 5, 2019 Order of Kurz J., with regard to entry between Norris and the kid C., shall be complied with in all respects. This Court docket orders, additional, that the police are hereby approved to implement the mentioned Order, and the one made herein.

[13]  Lastly, what do I imply by “accountable adherence to the present Court docket Order”? I imply being sensible and having some primary widespread sense. Bodily distancing measures should be revered. The events should do no matter they will to make sure that neither of them nor the kid, C., contracts COVID-19. Each precautionary measure advisable by governments and well being authorities in Ontario and Canada should be taken by each events and, with their assist, by C. Neither occasion shall do something that can expose him/herself or C. to an elevated danger of contracting the virus.

[31]        In Ribeiro v. Wright 2020 ONSC 1829, the Court docket mentioned the next:

[21]  We’ll cope with COVID-19 parenting points on a case-by-case foundation.

  1. The mum or dad initiating an pressing movement on this subject shall be required to offer particular proof or examples of habits or plans by the opposite mum or dad that are inconsistent with COVID-19 protocols.
  2. The mum or dad responding to such an pressing movement shall be required to offer particular and absolute reassurance that COVID-19 security measures shall be meticulously adhered to – together with social distancing; use of disinfectants; compliance with public security directives; and so on.
  3. Each dad and mom shall be required to offer very particular and sensible time-sharing proposals which absolutely deal with all COVID-19 issues, in a child-focused method.
  4. Judges will doubtless take judicial discover of the truth that social distancing is now changing into each commonplace and accepted, given the variety of public services which have now been closed. This can be a excellent time for each custodial and entry dad and mom to spend time with their little one at residence.

[23]  Judges received’t want convincing that COVID-19 is extraordinarily critical, and that significant precautions are required to guard youngsters and households. We all know there’s an issue. What we’re searching for is sensible options. We shall be trying to see if dad and mom have made good religion efforts to speak; to indicate mutual respect; and to provide you with artistic and sensible proposals which display each parental perception and COVID-19 consciousness.

End result

The decide ordered the mom’s parenting time to be resumed.

Abstract and Takeaway

The quick abstract of the entire above is that point with each dad and mom are vital. And that, to a point, practically everyone seems to be partaking in actions which have some stage of danger.


  • parenting preparations require transportation or driving to a different group,
  • one of many dad and mom is in a riskier occupation,
  • one of many dad and mom has a monitor file of earlier irrational behaviour, and so on

These considerations are inadequate to withhold parenting time. It’s typically anticipated that parenting orders or preparations shall be obeyed and that youngsters will proceed to see each dad and mom in these instances, absent very extraordinary and concrete points.  Courts are taking the view that point with dad and mom continues to be useful and kids are entitled to it.

In case you have any considerations referring to parenting and COVID19 period, name us at 604-974-9529 or get in touch. 





Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here