Tennessee baby custody case abstract in divorce.

Karthik Rajendran v. Mary Florence Rajendran

The mom and father on this Sumner County, Tennessee, case have been married in 2013 and had one daughter who was born in 2015.  The daddy filed for divorce in 2017, and each events requested to be named major residential dad or mum.

The trial courtroom, Decide Joe Thompson, finally named the mom the first residential dad or mum.  Initially, the mom was granted considerably extra parenting time.  However beginning in July 2019, the events have been to have equal time on alternating weeks.  The trial courtroom additionally ordered that every one main choices can be made collectively.  The mom appealed to the Tennessee Court docket of Appeals.  She argued that equal parenting time was not within the baby’s greatest curiosity, and that the trial courtroom mustn’t have granted joint choice making authority.

The appeals courtroom began by noting that trial courts have broad discretion in terms of custody issues.  Nevertheless, a choice will be reversed whether it is an faulty evaluation of proof or depends on reasoning that causes an injustice.

The mom pointed to plenty of statutory elements the place she believed the decrease courtroom had dominated erroneously.  For instance, the trial courtroom had discovered that the period of time spent by every dad or mum with the kid was an element that equally favored each events.  The trial courtroom had famous that the mom did, certainly, spend extra time with the kid, however discovered the issue to be equal for the reason that father was capable of deal with the kid’s wants when he did have time along with her.  She additionally took concern with the issue involving love, affection, and emotional ties.

The appeals courtroom famous that it was an in depth query on a few of these points.  There have been no particular factual findings within the file that might make clear these rulings.  However it agreed that these elements favored the mom.

The mom additionally argued that the kid had shut relationships along with her relations, and that this issue strongly favored her.  Whereas it discovered that this concern wasn’t essentially dispositive, the appeals courtroom discovered that this concern was related.

After sifting by means of the entire statutory elements, the appeals courtroom finally concluded that 5 elements favored the mom, and that zero favored the daddy.  Whereas 4 elements have been equal, the appeals courtroom discovered that the elements favoring the mom ought to have been given extra weight.

After weighing the very best pursuits of the kid, the appeals courtroom finally concluded that an equal parenting association was not applicable.  It famous that there have been problems with distrust between the events, and the trial courtroom had specified the strategies of communication for the events. 

Though it famous that the mom was not fully with out blame, the Court docket of Appeals held {that a} joint parenting association was not workable.

For these causes, the Court docket of Appeals reversed the decrease courtroom’s ruling and remanded the case.  The prices of the enchantment have been assessed in opposition to the daddy.

No. M2019-00265-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sep. 16,  2020).

See authentic opinion for actual language.  Authorized citations omitted.

To be taught extra, see Child Custody Laws in Tennessee.

See additionally Tennessee Parenting Plans and Child Support Worksheets: Building a Constructive Future for Your Family that includes examples of parenting plans and baby assist worksheets from actual circumstances accessible on Amazon.com.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here